Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Spivey v. EVIG LLC dba Balance of Nature and Douglas L. Howard
as 1:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
William Spivey
Defendant:
EVIG LLC dba Balance of Nature and Douglas L. Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation, Inc. v. St. Marks Avenue, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03525
Plaintiff:
The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
St. Marks Avenue, LLC, William Spivey, Stacy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Sandra Spivey et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 2:2014cv03357
Plaintiff:
Sandra Spivey and William Spivey
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Spivey et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv04653
Defendant:
City of New York, Gaetjean Doxy, John and Jane Doe 1 though 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Spivey and William Spivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Spivey v. Doe et al
as 1:2011cv08553
Plaintiff:
William Spivey
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spivey v. Arbuckle et al
as 1:2011cv01102
Plaintiff:
William Spivey
Defendant:
Travis Arbuckle, John Doe and McLean County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spivey v. Furlow et al
as 3:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
William Spivey
Defendant:
Sean Furlow, Major Beboot, Major Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spivey v. Bradley et al
as 3:2010cv01037
Plaintiff:
William Spivey
Defendant:
Lt. Bradley, Sgt Throop, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spivey v. McLafferty et al
as 3:2010cv00984
Plaintiff:
William Spivey
Defendant:
Mary McLafferty, Major Edwards, Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spivey v. Stateville N.R.C. , IDOC Counselor for Receiving et al
as 1:2010cv06433
Plaintiff:
William Spivey
Defendant:
Stateville N.R.C. , IDOC Counselor for Receiving
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
