Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GUIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STACY GUIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TIMMONS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94299
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STACY TIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timmons v. Brooks et al
as 3:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
William Stacy Timmons
Defendant:
Latasha Brooks and Tirah Wesley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timmons v. Ladner et al
as 3:2016cv00984
Plaintiff:
William Stacy Timmons
Defendant:
Brian Ladner, Latasha Brooks and Tirah Wesley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timmons v. Ladner et al
as 3:2016cv00983
Plaintiff:
William Stacy Timmons
Defendant:
Brian Ladner, Latasha Brooks and Tirah Wesley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timmons v. Banks et al
as 3:2016cv00970
Plaintiff:
William Stacy Timmons
Defendant:
Wendell Banks, Latasha Brooks and Unknown Wesley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Henry v. County of Kerrville, et al
as 16-50623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH AARON HENRY
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF KERRVILLE, KERRVILLE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, PHILIP KARASEK and others
Henry v. County of Kerrville et al
as 5:2016cv00284
Defendant:
Stephen B. Ables, Robinn Burlew, Gary Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Aaron Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Yawn et al v. Bowie et al
as 3:2014cv00466
Defendant:
Robert J Bowie and United States Marshal Service
Plaintiff:
Blake A Yawn and William Stacy Yawn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
