Cases 1 - 10 of 10
US v. William Hooper, Jr.
as 24-6036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM WELLINGTON HOOPER, JR.
Hooper v. USA
as 4:2023cv00124
Petitioner:
William Wellington Hooper, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
US v. William Hooper, Jr.
as 23-6861
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM WELLINGTON HOOPER, JR.
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09120
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WELLINGTON JONES, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States v. William Williams
as 21-2307
Defendant / Appellant:
William Wellington Williams
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
US v. William Hooper, Jr.
as 21-4220
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM WELLINGTON HOOPER, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WELLINGTON v. COOK INCORPORATED
as 1:2016cv03199
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WELLINGTON
Unknown:
Philip A. Pendergrass, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
WELLINGTON v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2016cv09340
Plaintiff:
William Wellington
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abrams et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv06587
Plaintiff:
Michael Abrams , Joan Beier , Linda Faye Bennett and others
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. William Wellington William
as 12-3883
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
William Wellington Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
