Cases 1 - 10 of 10
USA v. William Smith
as 20-5594
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM RICHARD SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. William Turner
as 19-5960
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM RICHARD TURNER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02402
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Forshey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01911
Plaintiff:
William Richard Forshey
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richards v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
William Richards
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. et al v. Catlett Quality Plumbing & Heating, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. and CHK Utica, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Catlett Quality Plumbing & Heating, Inc. , Schmuck Farms, LLC , Mark S. Addis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eisemann et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2011dp21583
Plaintiff:
William Richard Eisemann and Kathleen Eisemann
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clayton et al v. Lancia et al
as 3:2009cv00294
Plaintiff:
Charles Clayton, Michael G. Campbell, Shawn Michael Hartford and others
Defendant:
Christine A. Lancia, Randall S. Pitcher and Donald M. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Richards #585633 v. McKee
as 1:2007cv01104
Petitioner:
Robert William Richards #585633
Respondent:
Kenneth T. McKee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
