Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Rushing et al v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00411
Plaintiff:
William Rushing
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. , Williams-Sonoma DTC, Inc. , Williams-Sonoma Advertising, Inc. and others
Movant:
Lynn A. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC. et al v. WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.
as 1:2017mc02848
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RUSHING
Defendant:
WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
BRADY MARKETING COMPANY, INC. v. Kai USA, Ltd.
as 3:2017mc80110
Plaintiff:
Brady Marketing Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Kai USA, Ltd.
Movant:
Williams Sonoma, Inc
Camillo Echavarria, et al v. Williams Sonoma Inc, et al
as 16-8040
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
CAMILLO ECHAVARRIA
Defendant - Respondent:
WILLIAMS SONOMA INC, RP, J&J TRUCKING INC, AKA JJP and MXD INC, FKA Exel Direct Inc
Bass Pro Group, LLC et al v. Visa, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv07540
Plaintiff:
1-800 Contacts, Inc. d/b/a Glasses.com, 1-800 Contacts, Inc. d/b/a South Valley Optical, American Sportsman Holdings Co and others
Defendant:
Mastercard Incorporated, Mastercard International Incorporated, Visa Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Bass Pro Group, LLC et al v. Visa, Inc. et al
as TXE/2:14-cv-01093
Plaintiff:
Bass Pro Group, LLC , Bass Pro Group, LLC (a DE Corp) , American Sportsman Holdings Co and others
Defendant:
Visa, Inc. , Visa U.S.A., Inc. , Visa International Service Association and others
Bass Pro Group, LLC et al v. Visa, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01093
Plaintiff:
Bass Pro Group, LLC , Bass Pro Group, LLC (a DE Corp) , American Sportsman Holdings Co and others
Defendant:
Visa, Inc., Visa U.S.A., Inc., Visa International Service Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Webvention LLC ('294) Patent Litigation
as 1:2011md02294
Plaintiff:
Novartis Corporation, Furniture Brands International, Inc., HDM Furniture Industries, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Webvention Holdings LLC , Webvention , Adidas America Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Landstar System, Inc. et al , Landstar System Holdings, Inc. , Landstar System, Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
Webvention LLC , 20-20 Icovia Inc., Marie Claire/Hearst and others
REALSOURCE V BEST BUY
as 07-1387
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc. and Best Buy Stores, LP
Defendant-Appellee:
Circuit City Stores, Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation, Lowe's Companies, Inc. and others
Lowe's Companies, Inc:
Pottery Barn, Inc:
Plaintiff-Appellant:
RealSource, Inc. (d/b/a RealSource Communications, Inc.)
In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2005md01720
Interested Party:
Parkside Movies 14, Hampton Allied Pharmacy, Mon Ami Gabi Development LLC, DBA Mon Ami Gabi - Oakbrook and others
Not Classified By Court:
Keewatin Sinclair, Valentine Stores, Inc., Alsaker Corp/Broadway Truck Stops and others
Plaintiff:
Joe's Crab Shack - Abingdon MD, Inc., William-Sonoma Inc., Plaintiffs in Twisted Spoke v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., et al. 05-cv-5881 JG-JO and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Karla F. Solis, D.D.S., Inc. d/b/a LA Holistic Dentistry, Mr Gary Friedman and others
Defendant:
Defendants in civil action G.E.S. Bakery, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc,. et al. 05-cv-5879 JG-JO, Wells Fargo & Company, Defendants in civil action Performace Labs, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., et al 05-cv-5869 JG-JO and others
Amicus Curiae:
The European Commission, Canadian counsel for defendants in Canadian litigation received from and filed by hand by Canadian counsel, Amici Objecting States and others
Interpleader:
MNZ Inc
Respondent:
Visa Inc.
Intervenor:
Keila Ravelo and Mary Watson
3Rd Party Defendant:
Discover
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Oneota Community Food Co-op
Claimant:
St. Louis Airport Taxi, LLC.
In Re:
Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
