Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Winfrey v. The Doe Fund et al
as 1:2026cv07452
Plaintiff:
Eugene Winfrey
Defendant:
The Doe Fund and Lemle & Wolff Companies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. Thornton et al
as 4:2026cv00516
Plaintiff:
Ratacca Lamonze Marshall
Defendant:
JoJo Thornton, Kelly Thornton, Garrett Beeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robledo-Valdez #379066 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2026cv04520
Plaintiff:
Craig Sebastian Robledo-Valdez
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Ryan Thornell, Kris Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Syreeta McNeal v. Vera Calvin, et al
as 26-2141
Plaintiff:
Syreeta LaShawn McNeal, Esq.
Defendant:
Vera L. Calvin, Anthony T. Lofties, Joann A. Jenkins and others
Artis Goldsmith v. Janice Winfrey, et al
as 26-1517
Plaintiff:
ARTIS GOLDSMITH
Defendant:
JANICE WINFREY, Detroit, MI City Clerk and JOCELYN BENSON, Michigan Secretary of State
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ag Job Discrimination (Age)
Syreeta McNeal v. Vera Calvin, et al
as 26-1842
Plaintiff:
Syreeta LaShawn McNeal, Esq.
Defendant:
Vera L. Calvin, Anthony T. Lofties, Joann A. Jenkins and others
Lee v. Pichai et al
as 1:2026cv02140
Plaintiff:
Frederick Donnell Lee
Defendant:
Sundar Pichai, Hideaki Nishino, Google and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winfrey v. The Doe Fund et al
as 1:2026cv03225
Plaintiff:
Eugene Winfrey
Defendant:
The Doe Fund and Lemle & Wolff Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pd Fed. Question: Property Damage
Winfrey v. The Doe Fund et al
as 1:2026cv02963
Plaintiff:
Eugene Winfrey
Defendant:
The Doe Fund and Lemle & Wolff Companies
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
