Cases 1 - 10 of 480
Houston v. Mr. Frederick et al
as 4:2024cv01252
Plaintiff:
Reddie Houston
Defendant:
Mr. Frederick, Corey Jones and Mr. Winfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winfrey v. Louthan
as 5:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Ted James Winfrey
Respondent:
David Louthan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winfrey v. Brittany
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Leonard Winfrey
Defendant:
Brittany
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winfrey v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Leonard Winfrey
Defendant:
Melissa Mitchell, Gaylene Fukagawa, Vanessa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Fredricks
as 24-20037
Plaintiff:
Reddie Houston
Defendant:
Plant Supervisor Fredricks, Shift Supervisor Jones and Shift Supervisor Winfrey
James-Irvin et al v. Buffalo Police Department, et al
as 2:2023cv01237
Plaintiff:
Keita M. James-Irvin, William W. Morris Jr. and Jazmin Morris
Defendant:
Buffalo Police Department, Alvin Robinson, Pete Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winfrey v. US Department of Commerce
as 24-1260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EULA WINFREY
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Patent and Trademark Office
Cannabis Professional Design, LLC et al v. Detroit, City of
as 2:2023cv13004
Plaintiff:
Cannabis Professional Design, LLC, MB City Transportation, LLC, HZ Detroit Holdings 1, LLC and others
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, David Bell and Janice Winfrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Victoria Dillihunt v. Jehovahs Witness et al
as 2:2023cv07729
Defendant:
Peter Hernandez, Montero Lamar Hill, Da Baby and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
