Cases 11 - 20 of 383
Wood v. FCI Gilmer
as 5:2023cv00339
Petitioner:
Wesley Wood
Respondent:
Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James v. Woods et al
as 5:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Myron Sylvester James
Defendant:
Doctor Woods, Doctor Brishman, Lt. Siole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
James v. Abraham et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Myron Sylveste James
Defendant:
Lt. W/F Abraham, Doctor PA Wood, Doctor PA Burishman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wood v. Johnson et al
as 5:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Kandi Wood
Defendant:
Jason Johnson and Marshall County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hi-Lad, Inc. v. Colombo et al
as 2:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Hi-Lad, Inc.
Defendant:
James E. Colombo, Robert F. Tebay, David Blaire (sic) Couch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Dolgencorp, LLC
as 2:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Linda Woods
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC a Kentucky Limited Liability Company doing business as Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Woods v. United States Parole Commission
as 5:2022cv00294
Petitioner:
Willie Perry Woods
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garnes v. Encova Insurance Agency, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
Hayley Garnes
Defendant:
Encova Insurance Agency, Inc., Melissa Wood, Rachel Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Eakle v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
David Eakle
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
