Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Doe 1 et al v. X. AI Corp. et al
as 5:2026cv05231
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and Jane Doe 3
Defendant:
X. AI Corp., X.AI LLC and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Doe v. X. AI Corp. et al
as 5:2026cv05232
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
X. AI Corp., X. AI, LLC and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Doe v. X. AI Corp. et al
as 5:2026cv05226
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, 5
Defendant:
X. AI Corp., X. AI, LLC and X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2255 Violation of Protection of Children Against Sexual Exploitation Act
JOHNSON et al v. META PLATFORMS INC et al
as 1:2026cv00197
Plaintiff:
JJ JOHNSON and AMILLI AI CORP
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS INC, MARK ZUCKERBERG, X CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe 4 v. X. AI Corp. et al
as 5:2026cv05218
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 4
Defendant:
X. AI Corp., X. AI, LLC and X Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2255 Violation of Protection of Children Against Sexual Exploitation Act
Doe 3 v. X. AI Corp. et al
as 5:2026cv05193
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 3
Defendant:
X. AI Corp., X. AI, LLC and X Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Winkin v. OpenAI Inc., et al
as 26-1401
Plaintiff:
MARY ELIZABETH WINKIN
Defendant:
OPENAI INC., X AI CORP., XUECHEN LI and others
WINKIN v. OPEN AI INC et al
as 1:2026cv00142
Plaintiff:
MARY ELIZABETH WINKIN
Defendant:
OPEN AI INC, X AI CORP, XUECHEN LI and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Javor-Pendergast v. Musk et al
as 2:2025cv13475
Plaintiff:
Spencer Alenn Javor-Pendergast
Defendant:
Elon Musk, X Corp., Space X and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Severson v. Musk et al
as 2:2025cv00948
Defendant:
X, Elon Musk, Tesla Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Alonzo J Severson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
