Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Robinson v. Williams et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00602
Plaintiff:
Cordon M. Robinson
Defendant:
Warden Williams, Yes Care and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olson v. Yes Care Medical et al
as 7:2026cv01214
Plaintiff:
John Gordon Hale Olson
Defendant:
Yes Care Medical, Dr. Jason Fish and Nurse Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold et al v. Powles et al
as 1:2026cv05812
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Arnold
Defendant:
Pillion Powles, Sheriff Areta, Colonel Catletti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Powles et al
as 1:2026cv05724
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Arnold
Defendant:
Sgt. Dillion Powles, Sheriff Paul Arteta, Colonel Catletti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Yes Care
as 1:2026cv00242
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentel Pickens
Defendant:
Yes Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Williams et al
as 2:2026cv01028
Plaintiff:
Cordon M Robinson
Defendant:
Williams, Yes Care and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Yes Care Corp et al
as 4:2026cv04634
Defendant:
Yes Care Corp, Yitzchak Lefkowitz, Tehum Care Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
James v. Yes Care Corporation
as 1:2026cv02230
Plaintiff:
Robert A. James, Jr.
Defendant:
Yes Care Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Moore v. Frank Bishop
as 26-6625
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GARY MOORE
Defendant:
NEW WARDEN OF (WCI) JON GALLEY, HOLLY HOOVER, (Practitioner- NBCI), MASOUD DUAHANMIR, (doctor- WCI) and others
Williams v. Yes Care, Health Care, Inc. et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00385
Plaintiff:
Eric Williams
Defendant:
Yes Care, Health Care, Inc., Nurse Administrator, Nurse Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
