Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Davis v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
De'Maurea Davis, Yae-Yae and Yae Prince
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Edrian Wright v. SC Dept of Corrections
as 21-6037
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDRIAN DONYAE WRIGHT, a/k/a Yae, a/k/a Yaeyo
Edrian Wright v. Dr. Kendtz
as 21-6039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDRIAN DONYAE WRIGHT, a/k/a Yae, a/k/a Yaeyo
Defendant / Appellee:
BARBER BEEDE, Registered Nurse and KENDTZ, Psychiatrist
Wright v. James (MUSC)
as 0:2020cv04477
Plaintiff:
Edrian Wright, Yae, Edrian Donyae Wright and others
Defendant:
Dr. James (MUSC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Kendtz et al
as 0:2020cv02299
Plaintiff:
Edrian Donyae Wright, Yae and Yae, YaeYo
Defendant:
Barber Beede, Dr. Kendtz, Barber Beede (RN) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aung v. Barr, et al
as 1:2020cv00681
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Chad Wolf, Thomas Feeley and others
Petitioner:
YAE HTAT AUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Edrian Wright v. Medical University of SC
as 20-6781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDRIAN DONYAE WRIGHT, a/k/a Yae, a/k/a Yaeyo
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Official capacity
Edrian Wright v. Richland Memorial Hospital
as 20-6783
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDRIAN DONYAE WRIGHT, a/k/a Donyae, a/k/a Yae, a/k/a Yaeyo
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Official capacity
Edrian Wright v. SC Dept of Corrections
as 20-6784
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDRIAN DONYAE WRIGHT, a/k/a Yae, a/k/a Yaeyo
Wright v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2020cv01877
Plaintiff:
Edrian Donyae Wright, Yaeyo and Yae
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
