Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv11923
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Outlaw v. Wehrman et al
as 1:2026cv05121
Plaintiff: Mysti River Outlaw
Defendant: Joseph Wehrman, Lori Notestine, Kara Carnes-Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grupo MContigo S.L. v. Yoo
as 1:2026cv02725
Plaintiff: Grupo MContigo S.L.
Defendant: JOON BUM YOO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
GRUPO MCONTIGO S.L. v. YOO
as 2:2026cv13712
Plaintiff: GRUPO MCONTIGO S.L.
Defendant: JOON BUM YOO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10131
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Lee v. Kyustar Enterprises LLC et al
as 1:2026cv04910
Plaintiff: Yoo Na Lee
Defendant: Kyustar Enterprises LLC doing business as Irish Bred Pub, Young Kyu Chang and Irish Bred Pub
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Copeland v. Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Golubchik, LLP, et al.
as 26-5557
Plaintiff: BRUCE DWAIN COPELAND
Defendant: LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER, YOO & GOLUBCHIK, LLP, formerly known as Levene, Neale, Bender, Rank, Brill and Yoo, LLP, TIMOTHY YOO, Individually, TODD ARNOLD, Individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv09039
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
US v. Young Yoo
as 26-4334
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: YOUNG YOO
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2026cv06534
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?