Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Haocheng v. YouTube Inc.
as 24-1116
Plaintiff:
HAOCHENG QIAN
Defendant:
YOUTUBE INC. and GOOGLE INC.
Inform Inc. v. Google LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01530
Plaintiff:
Inform Inc.
Defendant:
Google LLC, Google Inc,, Alphabet Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
City of East St. Louis v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00561
Defendant:
Peacock TV, LLC, DirectTV Corporation, Hulu, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of East St. Louis, Illinois and City of East St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 21-5210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice, Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice and others
HASBROUCK HEIGHTS BOARD OF EDUCATION v. GOOGLE LLC et al
as 2:2021cv13691
Plaintiff:
HASBROUCK HEIGHTS BOARD OF EDUCATION
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC, YOUTUBE, INC., JMO PRODUCTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Usana Health Sciences, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc.
as 5:2021mc80158
Plaintiff:
Usana Health Sciences, Inc.
Defendant:
YouTube, Inc.
Interested Party:
Google LLC
Belknap v. Alphabet, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01989
Petitioner:
Craig Belknap
Respondent:
Alphabet, Inc., YouTube, Inc. and Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 19-5014
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, Rice Pichon, BJ Fadem and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao, Esquire, Attorney and Yi Tai Shao
Perez v. YouTube, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00965
Plaintiff:
Louis Perez, Jr.
Defendant:
YouTube, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EEON Foundation v. Google Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv01317
Respondent:
Alphabet Inc., YouTube, Inc. and Google Inc.
Petitioner:
EEON Foundation
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
