Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Doe v. YouTube, Inc.
as 4:2020cv07493
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
YouTube, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 21-5210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice, Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice and others
WAG ACQUISITION, L.L.C. v. Google LLC et al
as 6:2021cv00816
Plaintiff:
WAG ACQUISITION, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Google LLC and YouTube, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
HASBROUCK HEIGHTS BOARD OF EDUCATION v. GOOGLE LLC et al
as 2:2021cv13691
Plaintiff:
HASBROUCK HEIGHTS BOARD OF EDUCATION
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC, YOUTUBE, INC., JMO PRODUCTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Usana Health Sciences, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc.
as 5:2021mc80158
Plaintiff:
Usana Health Sciences, Inc.
Defendant:
YouTube, Inc.
Interested Party:
Google LLC
ATHOS OVERSEAS, LTD. v. YouTube, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv21698
Plaintiff:
ATHOS OVERSEAS, LTD.
Defendant:
Google, LLC., Youtube, LLC. and YouTube, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
David Worden v. Krista Heming et al
as 2:2021cv01400
Defendant:
Krista Heming, The Heming Firm, LLC, Theresa Richard and others
Plaintiff:
David Worden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
OBADO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 3:2021cv01679
Plaintiff:
DENNIS OBADO
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, YOUTUBE INC, FACEBOOK INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Belknap v. Alphabet, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01989
Petitioner:
Craig Belknap
Respondent:
Alphabet, Inc., YouTube, Inc. and Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 19-5014
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, Rice Pichon, BJ Fadem and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao, Esquire, Attorney and Yi Tai Shao
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
