Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Jason MacDonald v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2025cv10368
Plaintiff:
Jason MacDonald
Defendant:
Secretary Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida, Mark S Blechman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOLITHO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2025cv14179
Plaintiff:
KAREN BOLITHO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MacDonald v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2025cv00446
Plaintiff:
Jason MacDonald
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. WETHERELL et al
as 3:2025cv00879
Plaintiff:
PRESTON LEWIS
Defendant:
T KENT WETHERELL, II, M CASEY RODGERS, HOPE THAI CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TOBIN v. PERKINS et al
as 3:2025cv00642
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW A TOBIN
Defendant:
K PERKINS, GRAY, LARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Kenneth O'Brien
as 25-10799
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH J. O'BRIEN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and ZACHARY C. BOLITHO, Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-10527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jason MacDonald
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
