Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Stryker Corporation et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01187
Plaintiff:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Puerto Rico, Ltd. and Stryker Sales Corporation
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc. and Zimmer Surgical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zimmer, Inc. et al v. Metcalf
as 1:2014cv01264
Plaintiff:
Zimmer, Inc. and Triple Play Orthopedics, Inc.
Defendant:
Danny R. Metcalf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zimmer Inc v. Masters et al
as 3:2014cv00312
Plaintiff:
Zimmer Inc
Defendant:
David Masters and Andrew Masters
Counter_claimant:
Andrew Masters and David Masters
Counter_defendant:
Zimmer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zimmer Inc v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00152
Plaintiff:
Zimmer Inc
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Orthopaedics and Cody Stovall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walk Inc et al v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 2:2013cv01743
Plaintiff:
Walk Inc and Kenneth W Bramlett
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc , Zimmer Holdings Inc and Accelero Health Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zimmer US Inc et al v. Ford
as 3:2012cv00768
Plaintiff:
Zimmer US Inc and Zimmer Inc
Defendant:
David R Ford, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Zimmer Inc v. Greatbatch LTD
as 3:2012cv00711
Plaintiff:
Zimmer Inc
Defendant:
Greatbatch LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Zimmer Inc v. Scott
as 3:2012cv00688
Plaintiff:
Zimmer Inc
Defendant:
W Norman Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1320 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Stryker Corporation et al v. Roche et al
as 1:2012cv01178
Plaintiff:
Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Defendant:
Gregory J. Roche and Zimmer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Zimmer, Inc. v. Lemus
as 4:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Zimmer, Inc.
Defendant:
Raul Lemus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
