Cases 1 - 10 of 24
WELLS FARGO BANK NA v. AMES et al
as 2:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
Defendant:
MARK A AMES, JASON M NADEAU, CHRISTOPHER J NADEAU and others
Interested Party:
CITIFINANCIAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
TURNER v. SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00194
Plaintiff:
KELLY TURNER
Defendant:
PAN AM RAILWAYS INC and SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
AMES v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv00383
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
GILBERT AMES, JR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
HARRIS v. LIBERTY et al
as 1:2019cv00346
Defendant:
TERRY SCOTT DRAKE, JOSHUA BLACK, JOE MANNING and others
Plaintiff:
DARIEN HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONANT et al v. FMC CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv00296
Plaintiff:
THOMAS AMES, RODNEY MASON, TODD CONANT and others
Defendant:
FMC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAPE RECLAIMED LLC v. AMES, DC et al
as 1:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
SHAPE RECLAIMED LLC
Defendant:
RICKIE L AMES, DC, ALISHA AMES and TEMPLE HEALTH NUTRITION LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
TUGGLE v. PORTLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
STEVEN TUGGLE
Defendant:
PORTLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, PPD CHIEF MICHAEL SAUSCHUCK, MACDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK v. MAINE DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2014cv00407
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M COOK
Defendant:
MAINE DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, MAINE STATE PRISON, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
