Cases 21 - 30 of 210
In Re: SSA Bonds Antitrust Lit
as 20-1759
Defendant:
John Doe Defendants Nos. 1-100, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Barclays Services Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Northern California, Irving Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund, City of Riviera Beach Police Officers' Pension Fund, on behalf of itself and all otrhers similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation, Alaska Department of Revenue, Treasury Division and Iron Workers Pension Plan of Western Pennsylvania, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Deutsche Bank AG, Bank of America, N.A. and others
IN RE: ICE LIBOR ANTITRUST LIT
as 20-1492
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Livonia Retiree Health amd Disability Benefits Plan, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Annuity Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc., MUFG Bank, Ltd., The Norinchukin Bank and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute
Louisiana Asset Management Pool v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv01095
Defendant:
SG Americas Securities, LLC, BNP Paribas, RBC Capital Markets, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Asset Management Pool, Inc. and Louisiana Asset Management Pool
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Ford v. ProShares Trust II
as 20-419
Defendant:
Jefferies LLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Barclays Capital Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael L. Sapir, Newedge USA LLC, Todd B. Johnson and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Lisa Ludovici, Thomas Butler, III and Anthony Ludovici
Plaintiff:
David A. Ford, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
City of Baton Rouge/East Baton Rouge Parish et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2019cv00725
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Merrill Lynch, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Baton Rouge/East Baton Rouge Parish, Consolidated Parish Employees Retirement System and Police Guaranty Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
City of Coral Springs Police Officers' Retirement Plan v. Farfetch Limited et al
as 1:2019cv08720
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Coral Springs Police Officers' Retirement Plan
Omdahl v. Farfetch Limited et al
as 1:2019cv08657
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff Omdahl
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
FrontPoint Asian Event Driven v. Citibank, N.A.
as 19-2719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fund Liquidation Holdings LLC, as assignee and successor-in-interest to FrontPoint Asian Event Driven Fund L.P., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated,
Defendant:
John Does, Nos. 1-50, Citibank, N.A., Citigroup Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DBS Bank Ltd., UBS AG, BNP Paribas Securities Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
FrontPoint Asian Event Driven Fund, L.P., Sonterra Capital Master Fund, LTD. and FrontPoint Asian Event Driven Fund, Ltd.
Puerto Rico Government Employees and Judiciary Retirement Systems Administration v. BofA Securities, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03261
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PUERTO RICO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AND JUDICIARY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Police Retirement System of St. Louis v. BofA Securities, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03122
Defendant:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED, IN ITS INDIVIDUAL AND CUSTODIAL CAPACITIES, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Credit Suisse (USA) LLC. and others
Plaintiff:
The Police Retirement System of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
