Cases 1 - 10 of 1,487
Pena, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3618
Petitioner:
OSMAN FELICIANO PENA, OSMAN PENA-ZEPEDA, HERMINIA NATALY ZEPEDA-PEREZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cervante v. MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS LLC et al
as 1:2024cv21961
Plaintiff:
Deisy Ramirez Cervante
Defendant:
MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS LLC, Schindler Elevator Corporation and Joshua Feliciano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Collazo v. Ruiz-Feliciano, et al
as 24-1478
Plaintiff:
ODETTE LOPEZ COLLAZO, MARITZA FONT ORTIZ and VERANIA CRESPO CRUZ
Defendant:
WILFREDO RUIZ-FELICIANO, LUIS VELEZ, NANCY LABOY and others
Feliciano Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03638
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Feliciano Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
FELICIANO v. BALATGEK et al
as 5:2024cv02010
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE S. FELICIANO
Defendant:
OFFICER KAILA BALATGEK and THE CITY OF ALLENTOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benton-Feliciano v. New Georgia Project, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
Vaqala Latrice Benton-Feliciano
Defendant:
New Georgia Project, Inc.
Navas Feliciano v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00654
Petitioner:
Adal Antonio Navas Feliciano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Feliciano v. Braxton College Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Amy Feliciano
Defendant:
Braxton College Inc and Richard Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
