Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv05007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Zheiang Hahai Pharmaceutical Co. et al
as 1:2026cv05087
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Zheiang Hahai Pharmaceutical Co., Hetero Lab (India), Mylan Pharmaceuticals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04413
Plaintiff:
Donald C. Morrow, Thomas Plock, Shon Richardson and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Michael Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 26-11541
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES SMITH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
SMITH v. MARKLEY OPERATOR, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv02857
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH
Defendant:
MARKLEY OPERATOR, LLC doing business as MARKLEY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER, CEDARBRIDGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, MARQUIS HEALTH CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
US v. James Smith
as 26-6478
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMES SMITH, a/k/a Little Rock, a/k/a Shorty Stupid
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv03150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pierre v. Wynter et al
as 1:2026cv02068
Plaintiff:
Jerole Pierre
Defendant:
Sashanna Wynter, Gardy Brazela, Edward A Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Laprade v. Hayes et al
as 3:2025cv00599
Plaintiff:
Lamont Laprade
Defendant:
S. Hayes, James Smith, Austin Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
