Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
William Bulger v. Hugh Hurwitz
as 22-1106
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM M. BULGER, Administrator of the Estate of James Bulger
Defendant / Appellee: HUGH HURWITZ, formerly John Doe 1 - ALL OF WHOM ARE EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. A. KELLER, formerly John Doe 3 - ALL OF WHOM ARE EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ANGELA DUNBAR, formerly Jane Doe 4 - ALL OF WHOM ARE EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Ronald McGugan v. Harold Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-7448
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD W. MCGUGAN
Defendant / Appellee: HAROLD CLARKE, JOHN DOE #1, Warden of Pocahontas, KEVIN PUNTUR, Current Warden and others
Doe #13 v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv00819
Plaintiff: John Doe #13
Defendant: The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Doe #1 v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv00806
Plaintiff: John Doe #1
Defendant: The United States of America
Consolidated Plaintiff: John Doe #23, John Doe #21, John Doe #40 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Garrett et al v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00185
Plaintiff: Roger Reid, Michael Garrett, Abewole Ojo and others
Defendant: John Doe, 15, John Doe, 10, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. City Of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2017cv00013
Plaintiff: Aristolis Bennett, Aristacia Bennett and Alfricka Bennett
Defendant: City Of Fayetteville , Christopher Hunt , Michael D. Bohannon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gwendolyn Smalls v. James Binner
as 16-1385
Plaintiff - Appellee: GWENDOLYN SMALLS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Linwood Raymond Lambert, Jr., deceased
Defendant - Appellant: CHIEF OF POLICE JAMES W. BINNER, Colonel, Individually and in his official capacity, DEPURTY CHIEF OF POLICE BRIAN K LOVELACE, Individually and in his official capacity, CITY OF SOUTH BOSTON, VIRGINIA and others
Defendant: JOHN DOE #1, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #2, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #3, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department and others
Gwendolyn Smalls v. James Binner
as 16-1383
Plaintiff - Appellant: GWENDOLYN SMALLS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Linwood Raymond Lambert, Jr., deceased
Defendant - Appellee: CHIEF OF POLICE JAMES W. BINNER, Colonel, Individually and in his official capacity, DEPURTY CHIEF OF POLICE BRIAN K LOVELACE, Individually and in his official capacity, CITY OF SOUTH BOSTON, VIRGINIA and others
Defendant: JOHN DOE #1, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #2, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #3, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department and others
Eric S. Clark v. County of Fairfax, Virginia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1705
Plaintiff - Appellant: ERIC S. CLARK
Defendant - Appellee: THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA, RICHARD W. NAGEL, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia, R. L. DAVIS, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia and others
Eric Clark v. County of Fairfax, Virginia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2101
Plaintiff - Appellant: ERIC S. CLARK
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA, RICHARD W. NAGEL, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia, R. L. DAVIS, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?