Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Pierce v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08416
Plaintiff:
Michael Pierce
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Pierce v. Idaho State Correctional Center, et al.
as 1:2022cv00486
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Pierce
Defendant:
Idaho State Correctional Center, Idaho Department of Correction, C.O. Dodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steve Wilson Briggs v. James Cameron, et al
as 20-17229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE K. WILSON BRIGGS
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNET ARCHIVE, ZERO GRAVITY, LIGHTSTORM ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Briggs v. Cameron et al
as 3:2020cv01596
Defendant:
Zero Gravity, Internet Archive, Lightstorm Entertainment Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Wilson Briggs
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Michael Pierce v. Douglas Ducey
as 19-17071
Defendant / Appellant:
DOUGLAS A. DUCEY, in his capacity as Governor of the State of Arizona
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL PIERCE
Thomas Pierce v. Subolt Shroff, et al
as 17-17118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS MICHAEL PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
SUBOLT SHROFF, Doctor/ Medical Provider at A.S.P.C. Florence, CORIZON LLC, Health Care at Florence/ Eyman, CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden and others
Willis v. Foreman et al
as 2:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Averille Leon Willis
Defendant:
Norkesha Foreman, Jon Weddle, Gregg Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Ducey et al
as 2:2016cv01538
Plaintiff:
Michael Pierce
Defendant:
Douglas A Ducey, Michelle Regan, David M McGowan, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
