Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kate Louise Powell v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Kate Louise Powell
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, nanyangshenqimaoyiyouxiangongsi., Mislojade Official Store and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
MORALES-MATEO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40678
Plaintiff:
PILLY A MORALES-MATEO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Johnson v. Pilli et al
as 1:2019cv05665
Defendant:
J. Judkins, J Pilli, S Manis and others
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Squeo et al
as 1:2019cv03417
Defendant:
Hawkins, J. Mueller, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
D'Aaron Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv06834
Defendant:
C/O Stroh, John Doe, C/O Mansar and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hebron v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
Antwon T. Hebron
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Sgt Magalaya, C/O Dracka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggs v. Arone et al
as 3:2013cv00334
Plaintiff:
James L. Biggs, III
Defendant:
Leo C. Arone, Peter Murphy, Benites and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL v. H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79790
Plaintiff:
PILLIE POSEY HARRELL
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., KEENE CORPORATION, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dickinson v. Goings et al
as 1:2008cv00375
Plaintiff:
Jayson Dickinson
Defendant:
R Goings, D. Williamson, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
