Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 359
State of Florida v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-11528
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Amicus Curiae: IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE, THE STATE OF VIRGINIA, AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE and others
Not Classified By Court: THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
State of Washington, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-35294
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ROBERT M. CALIFF, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Petitioner / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF IOWA, STATE OF MONTANA and others
Robert Clayborne, Jr. v. State of Nebraska
as 23-1717
Petitioner: Robert Earl Clayborne, Jr.
Respondent: State of Nebraska
In Re: Subpoena Issued to Innovation Law Lab
as 6:2023cv00420
Plaintiff: State of Arizona, State of Louisiana, State of Missouri and others
Defendant: Merrick Garland, U S Dept of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner: Innovation Law Lab
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
The State of Arizona et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv01324
Plaintiff: The State of Arizona, The State of Louisiana, The State of Missouri and others
Defendant: Merrick Garland, The United States Department of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner: Innovation Law Lab
The State of Arizona et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023mi00015
Plaintiff: The State of Arizona, The State of Louisiana, The State of Missouri and others
Defendant: Merrick Garland, The United States Department of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner: Innovation Law Lab
State of Washington et al v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03026
Plaintiff: State of Washington, State of Oregon, State of Arizona and others
Defendant: United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert M Califf, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of Idaho, State of Iowa, State of Montana and others
Amicus Curiae: Legal Voice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
State of Nebraska, et al v. Martin Walsh, et al
as 23-15179
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARIZONA and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Arizona
Defendant / Appellee: MARTIN J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Labor, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Wage & Hour Division, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States and others
State of Utah et al v. Walsh et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00016
Not Classified By Court: State of Iowa
Plaintiff: State of Utah, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant: Martin Walsh, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor and Martin J Walsh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00007
Plaintiff: State of Alabama, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae: Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?