Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Addison-Hill v. Daymark Recovery Services, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Tawana Addison-Hill
Defendant:
Daymark Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
SALES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00834
Plaintiff:
TAWANA SALES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Nolon v. Owens et al
as 5:2021ct03110
Plaintiff:
Ardie D. Nolon and Ardie Defronso Nolon
Defendant:
Lerohn Litinchum, Tawana Freeman, Carie Spruill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALES v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2019cv00476
Plaintiff:
TAWANA SALES
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
NANCY BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Bethea v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00145
Plaintiff:
Tawana L. Bethea
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davidson v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00402
Plaintiff:
Tawana Davidson
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
BROOKS v. SSC CONCORD OPERATING COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00367
Plaintiff:
TAWANA B. BROOKS
Defendant:
SSC CONCORD OPERATING COMPANY, LLC , SAVASENIORCARE CONSULTING, LLC , SMV CONCORD, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAMPSON v. GUILFORD COUNTY, ET AL.
as 1:2016cv01069
Plaintiff:
TAWANA F. SAMPSON
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY, GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MARTY LAWING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMPSON v. GUILFORD COUNTY, ET AL
as 1:2016cv00376
Plaintiff:
TAWANA F. SAMPSON
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY, GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, MARTY LAWING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SALES v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01224
Plaintiff:
TAWANA SALES
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
