Cases 81 - 90 of 3,585
Jesus Marcos v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jesus Marcos
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Marcos v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jesus Marcos
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hrusovsky v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Robert Hrusovsky
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Headwater Partners II LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Headwater Partners II LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc., Sprint LLC, AT&T Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Headwater Partners II LLC v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Headwater Partners II LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC and AT&T Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
