Cases 1 - 10 of 826,228
Dawkins v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
as 4:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Elkino Dawkins, Sr
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Economic Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Becerra #198128 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00239
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Becerra
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. RH
as 3:2024cv02774
Plaintiff:
Kaela Washington
Defendant:
RH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Humbl, Inc. v. Pacific Lion LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01009
Plaintiff:
Humbl, Inc.
Defendant:
Pacific Lion LLC, Jacob Fernane and Robert Hymers, III
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Watson v. Doe et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Pierre Terron Watson
Defendant:
John Doe, S. Jones, A. Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Estrella et al v. Ohio Security Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv01188
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Estrella and Sy'Lai Gabriel
Defendant:
Ohio Security Insurance Company, Alliance Exposition Services, LLC and Chase Michael Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
