Cases filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama matching "S"
Cases 111 - 120 of 826,468
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01093
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Martinez v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv00545
Plaintiff: Jesus Belia Martinez
Defendant: Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02109
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024bk30673
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024bk00879
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dawkins v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
as 4:2024cv00237
Plaintiff: Elkino Dawkins, Sr
Defendant: Arizona Department of Economic Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Becerra #198128 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00239
Petitioner: Juan Carlos Becerra
Respondent: Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. RH
as 3:2024cv02774
Plaintiff: Kaela Washington
Defendant: RH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00817
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?