Cases 61 - 70 of 827,136
Barnes v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2024cv01388
Plaintiff:
Judy S Barnes
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McGovern et al v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
David M. McGovern and Local 1703 of the I.A.F.F.
Defendant:
William Bailey, III and Town of Tiverton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marchand v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02544
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Marchand
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Novoxel v. Sentient Manufacturing
as 2:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Novoxel
Respondent:
Sentient Manufacturing
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Parker v. Spinnaker Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv02331
Not Yet Classified:
Clerk W. Aaron Hall
Plaintiff:
Ray Parker
Defendant:
Spinnaker Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Baker v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
James Baker
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Livingston v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02543
Plaintiff:
Shawn Livingston
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McKinnon v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02545
Plaintiff:
Ralph McKinnon
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Medeiros v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02546
Plaintiff:
Maria Medeiros
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jacka v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02539
Plaintiff:
James Jacka
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
