Contract Cases filed in Connecticut matching "Viacom"
Cases 21 - 30 of 11,000
Becker v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv06900
Plaintiff: Patricia A Becker
Defendant: Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., Albert L Bossier, Jr and others
Cross Defendant: Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP and Eagle, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Paramount Global, Uniroyal Inc., Manville Personal Injury Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
King et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 7:2023cv05771
Defendant: Clark-Reliance LLC, Crane Instrumentation & Sampling Pft Corp, Paramount Global and others
Plaintiff: Richard D King and Lonie C King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Lewis et al v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv06764
Plaintiff: Brouney Lewis, Monica Kelly-Lewis, Levar Lewis and others
Cross Defendant: Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., General Electric Company, Redco Corporation and others
Defendant: Kohler Co., Flow Smart Inc., Albert Bossier and others
Cross Claimant: Huntington Ingalls, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: International Paper Company, Paramount Global, Hopeman Brothers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
LE v. SCHARF et al
as 2:2023cv03854
Plaintiff: JASMINE LE
Defendant: MICHAEL SCHARF, VIACOM CBS, INC. D/B/A KYW & WPSG TV and VIACOM CBS, INC. doing business as KYW & WPSG TV
Cross Defendant: ABC COMPANIES, 1-5
Cross Claimant: VIACOM CBS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Attebury et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv05014
Plaintiff: Ervel Attebury and Lutrecia Attebury
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Oswald et al v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust et al
as 1:2023cv01074
Defendant: Domco Products Texas, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., Paramount Global and others
Cross Defendant: Redco Corp, Judith Oswald, Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust and others
Cross Claimant: Goodrich Corporation, H.M. Royal, Inc. and IMO Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff: Edwin Oswald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Washington et al v. Eagle Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01381
Plaintiff: Claudette Washington and Courtney Skidmore Williams
Defendant: Eagle Inc., Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., The Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Plaisance, et al v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., et al
as 2:2023cv05426
Plaintiff: Corbert J Plaisance, Sr., Corbert J Plaisance, Sr, Corbert J Plaisance, Jr. and others
Cross Defendant: Eagle, Inc., Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation and others
Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (as insurer of Wayne Manufacturing Company), Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
3Rd Party Defendant: Travelers Indemnity Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Bayer CropScience, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Ragas v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv05369
Plaintiff: Ellery Ragas
Defendant: Anco Insulations, Inc., Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, Elliott Company and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1349 Outer Continental Land Shelf Act
Long v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01325
Defendant: 3M Company, Clark-Reliance LLC, Crane Environmental, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Richard D Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?