Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts matching "Wyatt Detention Facility"
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
In Re: Crooker
as 1:2010mc00162
Petitioner: Michael Crooker
Defendant: Brian K. Murphy, US Marshal and Donald W. Wyatt Detention Facility
Arms v. U.S. Marshals et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00400
Plaintiff: William A. Arms
Defendant: U.S. Marshals, Wyatt Detention Facility and Mr. Tapley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francois v. United States Marshal's Office et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00395
Plaintiff: Roldy Francois
Defendant: United States Marshal's Office, Donald W. Wyatt Detention Facility and Acting Warden Tapley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwardo Mathew v. Cornell Companies, Inc., et al
as 10-1182
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDWARDO ALEXANDRO MATHEW
Defendant - Appellee: BRUCE CHADBOURNE, MICHAEL WEBSTER, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Defendant: DONALD WYATT DETENTION FACILITY INCORPORATED, WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., TIMOTHY E. TAPLEY and others
Caldwell v. Wyatt Detention Facility et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00015
Plaintiff: Moses Caldwell
Defendant: Donald W Wyatt Detention Facility, Michael Fair, Tapley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00220
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008mc00048
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
De Los Santos v. Wyatt Detention Facility
as 1:2007cv00402
Plaintiff: Marino De Los Santos
Defendant: Donald W Wyatt Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?