Cases 41 - 50 of 111
Maaco Franchising, LLC v. Ghirimoldi et al
as 3:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
Stefano Ghirimoldi and Lumat LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Maaco Franchising, LLC v. King Collision Center et al
as 2:2014cv09754
Defendant:
Does, King Collision Center and Shaun P. Moise
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchising, LLC
Maaco Franchising, LLC v. BTTP Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00452
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
BTTP Enterprises, Inc., Bernard Polidore and Theresa Polidore
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Franklin, Sr. v. Steinmeyer
as 3:2014cv00900
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Franklin, Sr.
Defendant:
Heidi L. Steinmeyer and MAACO Collision Repair and Auto Paninting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAACO FRANCHISING, LLC v. FAVILA et al
as 2:2014cv02837
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, LLC
Defendant:
ANASTASIO E. FAVILA, ANITA Q. FAVILA and TEYAC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAACO FRANCHISING, LLC v. VETTORINO
as 2:2014cv02583
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, LLC
Defendant:
JOSEPH V. VETTORINO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Maaco Franchising LLC v. SRS Ventures Inc et al
as 8:2014cv00606
Defendant:
Does, Rosa Isela Garcia De Reynoso, Asam V Reynoso and others
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchising LLC
Nails v. State of Alabama et al
as 4:2014cv00234
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Mike West, James M Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. MARK VITALE, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02395
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
MARK VITALE, INC. and MARK VITALE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Maaco Franchising, Inc. v. Fitzgerald et al
as 4:2013cv01683
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchising, Inc.
Defendant:
Kevin E. Fitzgerald, Dana G. Fitgerald and Economy Auto Painting and Bodywork, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
