Cases 51 - 60 of 412
LOVE et al v. FIFTH THIRD BANK et al
as 3:2019cv21215
Defendant:
MB FINANCIAL BANK, N.A. and FIFTH THIRD BANK
Plaintiff:
CORRINE LOVE and ANDRE LOVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAREKH
as 2:2019cv14467
Defendant:
PARIND PAREKH
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HERESCO v. NETSPEND CORPORATION
as 2:2020cv01869
Defendant:
NETSPEND CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HERESCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALEKSANDR v. PNC BANK
as 2:2020cv01140
Plaintiff:
YUZHAKOV ALEKSANDR
Defendant:
PNC BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BAKER v. LINCOLN PARK BANCORP et al
as 2:2020cv08731
Defendant:
STEPHEN DORMER, LINCOLN 1ST BANK, LINCOLN PARK BANCORP and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FIORANI v. PNC BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2020cv03200
Defendant:
KAREN HICKS, CHRISTABEL IFEOMA OBI, SHERRY COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
ROASRIO "ROSS" FIORANI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
DRAZDIK V DIRECTOR INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ET AL
as 2:2020cv00549
Plaintiff:
ANDREW STEPHEN DRAZDIK, JR.
Defendant:
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, PENNSYLVANIA STATE BUREAU, DIRECTOR INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC
as 2:2020cv00476
Plaintiff:
CAITLIN STONE
Defendant:
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams et al v. Oriental Bank, Successor in intrest to the Bank of Nova Scotia
as 1:2020cv00026
Plaintiff:
Averricia Williams and Lunsford A. Williams
Defendant:
Oriental Bank, Successor in intrest to the Bank of Nova Scotia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KOCSIS v. ANTHIUM, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00099
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KOCSIS
Defendant:
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, ANTHIUM, LLC, CAM LOAN SERVICING and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
