Cases 1 - 10 of 12,791
LCHB111 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02781
Plaintiff:
LCHB111
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
LCHB107 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02787
Plaintiff:
LCHB107
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
LCHB061 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02790
Plaintiff:
LCHB061
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Ray et al v. Brown County et al
as 6:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Randall Ray and Estate of Trenton Ray
Defendant:
TX Brown County, City of Brownwood, Texas, Hendrick Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ray et al v. City of Brownwood, Texas et al
as 6:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Randall Ray and Estate of Trenton Ray
Defendant:
City of Brownwood, Texas, Brown County Texas, Hendrick Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
APH v. Agle
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
APH
Defendant:
Andrew Dale Agle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
PH v. Agle
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
A PH
Defendant:
Andrew Dale Agle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Yarnell v. Wellock
as 1:2024cv11227
Plaintiff:
Ann Yarnell
Defendant:
James F Wellock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
York et al v. Kouracos
as 6:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Carl York and Tracie York
Defendant:
Peter Kouracos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Libel, Assault, Slander
Ribas v. Besler
as 4:2024cv00632
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Ribas
Defendant:
Megan Besler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
