Cases 101 - 110 of 737,867
Zheng v. L. & S. Demo Recycling, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02020
Plaintiff:
Amy Zheng
Defendant:
L. & S. Demo Recycling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
COYLE PROPERTIES LIMITED II, LLC et al v. RSUI INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
COYLE PROPERTIES LIMITED II, LLC and COYLE MANAGEMENT, INC.
Defendant:
RSUI INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
GALAXY INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. NEBRASKALAND, INC.
as 2:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
GALAXY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
NEBRASKALAND, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
LIU v. ECONOMY PREMIER ASSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
HATAIO LIU
Defendant:
ECONOMY PREMIER ASSURANCE COMPANY and MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BEY v. HEDIGER et al
as 2:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM BEY
Defendant:
TERRY HEDIGER and ROBERT KEENAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCOTT v. ICE et al
as 3:2024cv00097
Petitioner:
JAMIE A.D. SCOTT
Respondent:
ICE, COLETTE PETERS and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Poerio
as 2:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Frank T. Poerio, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Justin Shaffer v. Daryl Bloom, et al
as 24-1828
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ERIC SHAFFER
Defendant:
DARYL F. BLOOM, Assistant Supervisor Attorney Prosecutor, CARLO D. MARCHIOLI, Assistant USA Attorney, JOHN C. GURGANUS, JR., United States Attorney (Primary Defendant) and others
Maria Disen v. Bayview Loan Servicing LLC
as 24-1885
Plaintiff:
MARIA J. DISEN
Defendant:
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC
Edward Sartoris v. Haidle, et al
as 24-1871
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SARTORIS
Defendant:
WARDEN HAIDLE, SGT. ZITO, Correctional Officer and DEPUTY WARDEN MCCOY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
