Cases 101 - 110 of 544,712
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. - Americans with Disabilities Act
Freeman v. Flat Rock Metal Inc.
as 2:2024cv10553
Plaintiff:
Travon Freeman
Defendant:
Flat Rock Metal Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DiFranco v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Michael James DiFranco
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Collins v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02145
Plaintiff:
Darryl Collins
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Leo Lamont Jones
Defendant:
Rutherford County and James Elliot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd v. Carthage Opco LLC
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Chelsey Boyd
Defendant:
Carthage Opco LLC a Tennessee Limited Liability Company doing business as Smith County Health and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Edward Johnson v. Brian Smith, et al
as 24-5436
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRIAN SMITH, Individually, JOSH STALLONS, Individually and EDWARD EASTMAN, Individually
Racer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02159
Plaintiff:
Derrick Racer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gerrard v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02118
Plaintiff:
Lisa Gerrard
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
