Cases 101 - 110 of 70,750
Shaw v. Dermatology Realm et al
as 2:2024cv02271
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Dermatology Realm, Clarx Big Country Dermatology, Memphis Dermatology and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Raymond's Auto Repair
as 2:2024cv02270
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Raymond's Auto Repair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calkin v. Wexford, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Calkin
Defendant:
SGT. Kristie Piskor, SGT. Anthony Vermeulen, CO Janice Vanhaltsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lucio v. Regency Owosso, LLC
as 2:2024cv11102
Plaintiff:
Lola Lucio
Defendant:
Regency Owosso, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cooper v. Dunn et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Erik Cooper
Defendant:
James Bruce Dunn, Ronald Crockett Newcomb, William Brownlow Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. Sevier County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Erik Cooper
Defendant:
Sevier County, Tennessee, Michael R. Hodges, Jr., Rhett Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv02265
Plaintiff:
Herman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor William Lee, David Rausch, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huber Heights Veterans Club, Inc. v. Kevin Bowman, et al
as 24-3342
Plaintiff:
HUBER HEIGHTS VETERANS CLUB, INC.
Defendant:
KEVIN ARTHUR BOWMAN, TIMOTHY R. WEBB, VOITURE NATIONALE LA SOCIETE DES QUARANTE HOMMES ET HUIT CHEVAUX and others
Michelle Rieg, et al v. Village of Seville, OH
as 24-3337
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE RIEG, BRIAN RIEG, SCOTT WANGLER and others
Defendant:
VILLAGE OF SEVILLE, OH
Intervenor:
NEO COMMERCE CENTER LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
