Cases 101 - 110 of 483
Horwitz v. Miller et al
as 3:2018cv00875
Defendant:
Thomas D. Miller, William S. Hussey, R. Lawrence Van Horn and others
Plaintiff:
Harvey Horwitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Tramuto et al
as 3:2018cv00797
Defendant:
Robert J. Greczyn, Jr., Mary Jane England, Peter Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew H. Allen
Cunningham v. UNUM Group et al (TV3)
as 1:2018cv00154
Defendant:
UNUM Group, John F. McGarry, Daniel J. Waxenberg and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Shust v. AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01129
Plaintiff:
Nestor Shust
Defendant:
AmTrust Financial Services, Inc., Donald T. DeCarlo, Susan C. Fisch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Scarantino v. Fairmount Santrol Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01047
Plaintiff:
Richard Scarantino
Defendant:
Fairmount Santrol Holdings, Inc., William E Conway, Jennifer D. Deckard and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Rosenblatt v. A. Schulman, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00992
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Defendant:
A. Schulman, Inc., Joseph M. Gingo, Allen A. Spizzo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Mattingly v. Bloomingdale Telephone Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00460
Defendant:
Bloomingdale Telephone Company, Inc. , Robert Remington , Richard Godfrey and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Mattingly, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shapiro v. Sherr et al
as 2:2018cv11187
Plaintiff:
Margot Shapiro
Defendant:
Roger Sherr, Stuart Sherr and Sherr Development Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Midkiff, Jr. et al v. Ludt et al
as 1:2018cv00191
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Midkiff, Jr and Horseco, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas Ludt , James LaMonica , Stuart Aikman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Zillich et al v. Zillich et al
as 1:2018cv00540
Plaintiff:
Gregory Zillich and Zillich Interiors, Inc.
Defendant:
Genevieve Zillich , Linda Tucholski and Zillich Interiors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
