Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 111 - 120 of 99,681
Michael Burnett v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1366
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ANGELO BURNETT
Defendant: HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of MDOC, in her official capacity, LIEUTENANT TAGGET, in individual capacity, LIEUTENANT BORIS, in individual capacity and others
Hill v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv02274
Plaintiff: Marqual Hill
Defendant: Shelby County Division of Corrections, Officer Rice and T. Payton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Green
as 0:2024cv00027
Plaintiff: Khalil Coleman
Defendant: David Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Marion County Sherriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff: Bryan R. Phillips
Defendant: Marion County Sherriff's Department, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraway v. Fitz
as 2:2024cv02263
Petitioner: Romilus Caraway
Respondent: Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Schiebner
as 2:2024cv11104
Petitioner: Lonnie Todd Barnes
Respondent: James Schiebner
Kuhl v. Mendham
as 1:2024cv00428
Petitioner: Thomas Benjamin Kuhl
Respondent: Bob Mendham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Walker #230537 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff: James Edward Walker #230537
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. BROWN
as 2:2024cv01973
Petitioner: QUINCY RAHSAAN ANDERSON
Respondent: Kim Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. USA
as 2:2024cv00066
Petitioner: Harold Vernon Smith
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?