Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 37,650
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05037
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2028
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Cruzen v. Thomas
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff: Shirley Cruzen
Defendant: Bill Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peet et al v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: Gregory Allen Peet, Sr. and Audrea Rachelle Peet
Defendant: City of Sikeston, Missouri, Greg Turnbow, Jonathan Douglass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 148 et al v. Franklin County, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00691
Plaintiff: International Union of Operating Engineers Local 148, Chad Alfermann, Austin Anderson and others
Defendant: Franklin County, Missouri, Tim Brinker, Todd Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Sanderson v. Myrdal
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff: Mitchell S. Sanderson
Defendant: Janne Myrdal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01010
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?