Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 99,761
Malvasi v. Warden David W. Gray
as 4:2024cv00474
Petitioner: Michael Malvasi
Respondent: Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00575
Plaintiff: Mack Jones
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. McCalister et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff: Darnell Moore
Defendant: Robin McCalister, Delvin Nielsen, Dylan Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deonte Dickey v. USA
as 24-3398
Petitioner: DEONTE DICKEY
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Simmons v. United States of America Probation Supervised Release et al
as 2:2024cv00079
Petitioner: Tavo Simmons
Respondent: United States of America Probation Supervised Release, Natasha Alexander Mingo and Chante Pagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. City of Louisville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff: Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant: City of Louisville Police Dept. and Victims Rights and Advocacy Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Rambus
as 2:2024cv11217
Plaintiff: Chris Cobb
Defendant: Rambus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Fighter-Daniel et al
as 2:2024cv11218
Plaintiff: Allen David Daniel
Defendant: Teri Fighter-Daniel, M. Sorensen, Barber and others
May v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff: Herbert May
Defendant: Calhoun, County of, Kurtis Cunkle, Sterling Ladd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Davis
as 5:2024cv00817
Petitioner: Timothy Titus
Respondent: Warden Cynthia Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?