Cases 51 - 60 of 28,807
Tene et al v. United Ground Express, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Evens Tene and Klountcha
Defendant:
United Ground Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
David Rodriguez v. Genuine Parts Company et al
as 5:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company a Georgia corporation doing business as NAPA Auto Parts and Does 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Combs v. Insomnia Cookies, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv02321
Plaintiff:
Christie Combs
Defendant:
Insomnia Cookies, LLC and Serve U Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
KRAVITZ v. REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL et al
as 1:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
STEVEN J. KRAVITZ
Defendant:
REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL and REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaskett v. Pemex Incorporated et al
as 4:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Ronald Augustine Plaskett
Defendant:
Pemex Incorporated and Shell LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jackson v. Baker Hughes Inc.
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
James R. Jackson
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Shane Villarino, et al v. Kenneth Joekel, et al
as 24-11124
Plaintiff:
WALTER STRONG, SHANE VILLARINO and LAURA JOHNSON
Defendant:
KENNETH JOEKEL, MARC PLOTKIN, PACESETTER PERSONNEL SERVICE, INC. and others
Hector et al v. Anderson Mechanical Services, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Herbert Hector and Herbert Core Drill, LLC
Defendant:
Anderson Mechanical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
ALLEN v. ASSERO SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2024cv01557
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDRE ALLEN doing business as ALLEN & SONS PRESERVATION
Defendant:
ASSERO SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
