District Court Cases in Alabama
Cases 61 - 70 of 90,115
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Horton v. Richerson et al
as 2:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Horton
Defendant:
Kelly Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Justin Garrett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pascual v. Martinez et al
as 4:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
Angelica Pascual
Defendant:
Cesar G Martinez and Crane Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Giles v. Spring Oaks Capital LLC
as 2:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Krashunda Giles
Defendant:
Spring Oaks Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johns et al v. Hatch et al
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Johnny Johns and Delyum Johns
Defendant:
James Donald Hatch and Presbyterian Church in America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Houser v. O'Neil et al
as 2:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Lecresha Renae Houser
Defendant:
Sean B O'Neil, Tracy Anne Pangillinan, Brett Seybold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Shelby County, Alabama v. Beaulieu
as 2:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Shelby County, Alabama
Defendant:
Henri N Beaulieu, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson v. Experian Information Solutions Inc
as 5:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Michael Gibson
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Rucker v. Hunter Wakefield Inc
as 2:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Andrew Rucker
Defendant:
Hunter Wakefield Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
