District Court Cases in Alabama
Cases 41 - 50 of 90,196
Hancock Whitney Bank v. FLC Living, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Hancock Whitney Bank
Defendant:
FLC Living, LLC, Invinci Corporation, MJO Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Cedric Orlando Young
Defendant:
Bonner, S Mitchell, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Su v. Mar-Jac Poultry of Alabama LLC
as 6:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Julie A Su
Defendant:
Mar-Jac Poultry of Alabama LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Slade v. Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores Inc.
as 2:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Marshall Slade
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oliver v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hudgins v. 2215 Northport Opco LLC
as 7:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Marcellus M Hudgins
Defendant:
2215 Northport Opco LLC doing business as Forest Manor Health and Rehab
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
Trejo v. Fair et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Alberto Trejo
Defendant:
K. Fair and Arnaldo Mercado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
