Fourth Circuit Social Security Cases

Retirement and Survivors Benefits Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 473
Steven Hill v. Carolyn Colvin
as 15-1529
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEVEN LEON HILL
Defendant - Appellee: CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Heeter v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2015cv01763
Plaintiff: Leona Ruth Heeter
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jenkins v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2015cv01684
Plaintiff: Clifton W Jenkins
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cobb v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00161
Plaintiff: Oscar Vann Cobb
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Davis v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00141
Plaintiff: Francis Edwin Davis, Jr
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
Burchett v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00411
Plaintiff: Timothy Lee Burchett
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tomey v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 1:2015cv00860
Plaintiff: Mark Steven Tomey, Sr.
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wondolowski v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv28923
Plaintiff: Patricia Wondolowski
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: g RSI Tax Suits
Spencer v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv00213
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Cecelia Spencer
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
Snelgrove v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 8:2014cv04440
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Henry Joseph Snelgrove
Cause Of Action: Denial of Social Security Benefits
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.