Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 36,563
Larry Tyler v. Director of the Darlington County Detention Center
as 24-6402
Petitioner:
LARRY JAMES TYLER
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF THE DARLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Harris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024cv00223
Petitioner:
Anthony Harris
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jerome Butts v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6399
Petitioner:
JEROME JILAH BUTTS
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Johnson v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02088
Petitioner:
Marty Johnson
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cromartie v. Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2024hc02089
Petitioner:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Respondent:
Department of Adult Correction, Todd Ishee, Roy Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Unknown Respondent
as 5:2024hc02087
Petitioner:
Patrick White
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ELLIS v. GORDER
as 1:2024cv00371
Petitioner:
KENNETH JERMAINE ELLIS
Respondent:
R. VAN GORDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maner v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2024cv02626
Petitioner:
Derek Maner
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yakubu v. Joseph
as 5:2024cv02633
Petitioner:
Nuru Yakubu
Respondent:
Warden Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jenkins v. Warden Lavern
as 0:2024cv02636
Petitioner:
Adrian Jenkins
Respondent:
Warden Lavern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
