North Carolina Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 49
JOHNSON v. CONLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
MARY H JOHNSON, MD
Defendant:
AZZIE CONLEY and LINDA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gibson v. North Carolina Office of Emergency Medical Services, et al
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Gibson
Defendant:
Gregory Ford, North Carolina Office of Emergency Medical Services, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Rose v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
David Rose
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Birchfield v. Kellex Corporation, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00362
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Birchfield
Defendant:
Kellex Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Saylon v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020cv00176
Defendant:
Chastina Brown, Carla Sturdivant and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Saylon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Baselice v. Harris Teeter, LLC
as 5:2020cv00006
Defendant:
Harris Teeter, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Baselice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CONRAD v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 1:2019cv01160
Plaintiff:
DAVID CONRAD
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION,INC and CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEE et al v. EWART et al
as 1:2019cv01154
Plaintiff:
RONNIE W. LEE, II and AKRESHA LEE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC., LARRY WAYNE EWART and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Harding v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2019cv00222
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Venus L. Harding
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
AMMONS V. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 1:2019cv00547
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Plaintiff:
KIRBY AMMONS
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
