US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 104,535
Burr et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00648
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Burr and Cindy J.M. Burr
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2019cv00646
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michelle D. Johnson and Tim Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2019cv00602
Plaintiff:
Roger Bryant and Judy Bryant
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Monsanto Management Club-Nitro Plant, Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson et al v. Altec Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00583
Defendant:
Altec Industries, Inc. and Altec, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jill Thompson and William Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stockton v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00565
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Susan Stockton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2019cv00542
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hyre v. CRC Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00505
Plaintiff:
David Hyre
Defendant:
CRC Industries, Inc. and Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gamble v. New River Adventures, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00453
Plaintiff:
Cherie Gamble
Defendant:
New River Adventures, Inc. and Autumn Breeze Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stover et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00441
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Delbert L. Stover and Shirley J. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dilliner et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2019cv00415
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Tracie Dilliner and Logan James Dilliner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
