Social Security Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 14,648
Adams v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Andrea Dawn Adams
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Khan v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Lashanda Khan
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Quinton L. Brown v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1544
Plaintiff:
QUINTON L. BROWN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Rivera-Fuentes v. Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
as 3:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Yadlin Rivera Fuentes
Defendant:
Commisioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dowd v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02662
Plaintiff:
Ann M. Dowd
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Diaz v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02677
Plaintiff:
Antonio Diaz
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McCrory v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02068
Plaintiff:
Kendra M. McCrory
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pitts v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Travis John Pitts
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
McCall v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Melisa Diane McCall
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Freund v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Linette Freund
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
