District Court Cases in Indiana
Cases 171 - 180 of 112,441
GIVENS v. COUNTRYMARK REFINING & LOGISTICS, LLC
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
SHAWN GIVENS
Defendant:
COUNTRYMARK REFINING & LOGISTICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
GRIFFIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
TANISHA N. GRIFFIN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
ROBERTSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
NORMAN LEON ROBERTSON, III
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LUCAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00891
Petitioner:
DUJUAN LUCAS and DEJUAN LUCAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ISBY v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00905
Petitioner:
AARON ISBY
Respondent:
CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PERKINS v. LANE et al
as 1:2024cv00907
Plaintiff:
JAMES PERKINS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER LANE and BARTHOLOMEW CO. JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00211
Petitioner:
TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HICKS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
JAMIE HICKS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
