Cases 71 - 80 of 3,715
DIARRA v. OBAMA
as 5:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA DIARRA
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Ducey et al
as 2:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Clarence D Johnson and HTH Construction
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Medical Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooks v. Lalonde et al
as 1:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Arthur Hooks
Defendant:
Stephaie Lalonde, Barack Obama, Michael Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooks v. Lalonde et al
as 2:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Arthur Hooks
Defendant:
Stephanie Lalonde, Michael Allen, Mitchell Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Obama
as 2:2021cv01462
Plaintiff:
James M Haynes
Defendant:
President Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Willis v. Bush et al
as 3:2021cv00760
Plaintiff:
Lynell Willis, Jr.
Defendant:
George Bush, II, Barack Obama and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniel Pohle v. Michael Pence, et al
as 21-3351
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL L. POHLE
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL R. PENCE, Former Governor of Indiana and Former Vice President of the United States of America, BARACK OBAMA, Former President of the United States of America, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Former Vice President and Current President of the United States of America and others
Twitty v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv03411
Plaintiff:
Andre J. Twitty
Defendant:
USA, Jay Cripps, Celeste Rangel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lim, Khor v. Tong, Goh et al
as 3:2021cv00781
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Goh Chok Tong, Barack Obama, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
